Dear all,
As discussed earlier today, attached you may find the files that you may use to evaluate the collected training materials. The Word file is a summary of the “questions” or key elements to be searched in the materials, while the Excel file is the usual tool to insert the data.
As you will see in the Excel file (inside you may find a few examples), it is a quite simple and swift procedure, because most questions can be answered with a yes/no.
To maintain uniformity, we encourage to fill in column A by making a copy-and-paste of the name of the file as it will be eventually saved in the repository. As you may notice, we added a code before the original file name: two letters indicating the Member State and “DPA” or "DPO" based on the source. This will allow us to reorganise the cells independently from the input date.
One or two files per country should suffice for this purpose. Should your DPAs or DPOs have not sent you any materials, we suggest you download what is available on their website to speed up the process: most DPAs publish training or informative materials online.
Due to the fact that this analysis is part of deliverable D2.2, we strongly hope you can send back your findings before the next Skype call of next week.
Should you need any clarification, please feel free to ask at any time.
Have a nice weekend. Best wishes,
Filippo
[https://image.ibb.co/dwgHzc/logo_copia.png]
Dr Filippo Marchetti
Trilateral Research Ltd.
72 Hammersmith Road, London W14 8TH<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Crown+House,+72+Hammersmith+Rd,+Hammersmi…>
+44 (0) 2075593550<tel:+442075593550>
www.trilateralresearch.com<http://www.trilateralresearch.com>
[https://image.ibb.co/bAymsx/124038.png] <https://join.skype.com/invite/blxVbvjlCHEv> [https://a8b03ffbc00ed4da54a1-0c6684360696717b63d89dbc0edb802c.ssl.cf1.rackc…] <https://twitter.com/fmarchetti_tri> [https://a8b03ffbc00ed4da54a1-0c6684360696717b63d89dbc0edb802c.ssl.cf1.rackc…] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/filippomarchetti/>
Dear all,
As discussed in the call today, please find attached the summary document setting out the findings from the interviews.
We will use this as a basis for a call on Thursday 3rd May at 14.00 CET to agree, define and delineate the training materials that we will develop.
Best wishes,
DBW
Dr David Barnard-Wills
Research Manager
Trilateral Research Ltd
david.barnard-wills(a)trilateralresearch.com
Twitter: @dbarnardwills, @trilateral_UK
Working hours: 9.30-14.45 GMT Mon,Tues,Thurs,Fri.
http://trilateralresearch.com/subscribe-to-our-mailing-list/
Crown House
72 Hammersmith Road
London
W14 8TH
www.trilateralresearch.com
Dear all,
As another 3 months of the project have passed we should have our second quarterly meeting to review the conducted work and plan the agenda for the upcoming weeks. Please indicate your availability by filling out the doodle: https://doodle.com/poll/n5avz4w355t96ym5
br,
istván
--
István Böröcz, LL.M.
d.pia.lab | Brussels Laboratory for Data Protection & Privacy Impact Assessments
Research Group on Law, Science, Technology & Society (LSTS) | Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Room 4C339, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
http://www.vub.ac.be/LSTS/ | http://dpialab.brussels
[id:image001.png@01D24A68.3EA39D90]<http://dpialab.brussels/>
Dear all,
Almost all information that is necessary for the completion of the grant agreement has been entered into the EC portal.
Part A: the missing points include:
* Details of NAIH department that is going to carry out the project and NAIH’s validation of partner summary info
* TRI validation of PIC status, so far it’s marked as DECLARED
* Starting date of the project: it can be the first day of the month after the entry into force of the GA or we can agree on a fixed starting date. We prepared timeline projections of STAR and STARII projects in order to see ‘peak times’. We consider August to be the most optimal date for starting STARII.
Part B: we have prepared a draft Annex B. For it to be completed we need to agree upon changes that we are going to make in the DOW based on the comments provided in the evaluation form. These comments concern:
The scope of the project:
* The geographical spread of the proposal is not very clear. How are you going to benefit all SMEs and data protection authorities in all EU Member States if the practical activities are targeting one single Member State (Hungary), and indirectly others?
* The target group is very broad, consisting of all SMEs in the EU, on the one hand, and data protection authorities on the other hand. How could we explain t this approach and what is the benefit of providing such a Europe-wide effort?
* It is difficult to understand in the way the project is written, whether the specific activities of the project target only Hungarian SMEs or all SMEs in the EU.
The hotline:
* This activity is not entirely convincingly presented. It is stated that the hotline will be operated in English and Hungarian, with other languages on needs basis. The results of the hotline questions will again form a basis for research activity.
* The e-mail based "hotline" is planned for one year, and it is not clear whether or how it will continue.
Results:
* The EU-wide general handbook for SMEs raises challenges in terms of addressing a wide variety of fields and types of SMEs in various countries, which means the handbook remains quite general in nature and thus might duplicate the already existing (CoE/FRA general handbook). There are also some national differences in implementation of data protection rules that the project might not consider fully.
* The responsibility regarding updating of the handbook is unclear.
* It is quite unlikely that SMEs might read about the project in an academic journal. Relying mainly on academic analysis in the EU as a whole, the needs assessment is not followed by the examination of the specific needs of the Member States.
* The project website will be maintained for two years only after the end of the project. It’s suggested to incorporate the content of the website on the NAIH’s website.
Could you please provide your suggestions on how we should address comments made in the evaluation by COB 9 April?
Best regards,
Lina Jasmontaite
Doctoral researcher
Law, Science, Technology and Society (LSTS)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Brussels Privacy Hub (BPH)
Room 4B306, Pleinlaan 2, 1050
Brussels, Belgium
http://secure-web.cisco.com/15PF1KlBZlHULJPYUQqz7GcWNhHguO5Erk3ohn3AiBXFKYB…<http://secure-web.cisco.com/15PF1KlBZlHULJPYUQqz7GcWNhHguO5Erk3ohn3AiBXFKYB…> || http://secure-web.cisco.com/1rGBrw6DfMuRF1PGJbF-lJ-54m8ajR0E-2IyoxEfCJfhMtr…<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1rGBrw6DfMuRF1PGJbF-lJ-54m8ajR0E-2IyoxEfCJfhMtr…> || http://secure-web.cisco.com/1fk-ioUDs0tp2pD3TdGsejRS_B74qo_tnDw168MW3cT2M3T…<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1fk-ioUDs0tp2pD3TdGsejRS_B74qo_tnDw168MW3cT2M3T…>
https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS43713818
dr. Julia Sziklay PhD.
Head of Department
International Affairs and Public Relations Department
National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information
Address: H-1125 Budapest,
Szilágyi Erzsébet fasor 22/C.
Postal address: H-1530 Budapest, Pf.: 5.
Tel: +36-1/391-1406
Fax: +36-1/3911410
Email:sziklay.julia@naih.hu
web address: <http://www.naih.hu/> www.naih.hu
_____